Results 

Our oscilloscope works well within a good accuracy. In general,
on the xaxis our results are as good as our choice for our timer1 compare match value,
which we chose rather carefully. The yaxis is divided into 200 mv, which gives us
results within 100mv of the correct value. This is because if the result is in between a
200mv value, if it is 100mv, it goes to the next highest 200mv level, and it is under 100mv, it
goes to the closest lower level. In terms of our time/division findings, we worked
with a range between .1 sec/division to 2ms/division because, at best, the lowest we
could go was 2 ms/division. This was due to the fact that during our ADC conversion we
need 13 cycles to complete it. Hence, we needed to take this time into account, so that
all the samples could be retrieved during the conversion. To be sure, of course, we
doublechecked our results with our findings on the computer scope card. For instance, for
the same sine wave, we measured our Vpp to be about 2.69 volts, and the scope measured
2.72 volts for its Vpp, approximately a 1.1% error. A more illustrative look is
presented below for your convenience. Here is a sine wave on the Scope Card: Note Vpp of 1.9 Volts and wavelength of 10ms. And Below is the same sine wave on our Scope with Vpp 1.828 and wavelength of 10ms
Above is a sine wave of 250 ms wavelength and Vpp of 1.9V. And below is the same wave on our scope with 250 ms wavelength and 1.826 Vpp.
In terms of procedures and methods we would do differently, we
would definitely
