Throughout this series of articles we've seen a number of "cheats"
or non-standard signals which simplify NTSC signal generation. This post
summarizes them.
1. "fake" progressive scan instead of interlaced scan. Write 262 lines per frame. This
makes it much easier to get a stable image on the TV. Only even lines
are written / drawn. The odd lines in between remain as black lines.
This technique has been used in NES, SNES, uzebox and a number of older
game consoles. [1]
2. "simple v-sync". The NTSC spec states that half-scanlines
should be used for v-sync. This includes 3 kinds of pulses
pre-equalization, serration and post-equalization. All of these are
unnecessary. One "long-sync" is sufficient to perform V-Sync. Of 262
lines in a frame, 261 lines have "short sync" lasting 4.7uS, one line
(usually line number 248) has a "long sync" lasting about 58.8555uS. [2]
Lets see this is with a bit more detail.
Lines 10-234 are visible and will have active video. All other lines will have sync followed by black level.
Every line other than 248 has the usual 4.7uS "short sync". Line 248 has a long sync lasting 58.55uS
3. Color burst always ON. If color generation is also
manually handled, this can simplify software a bit. Instead of giving
out 9-12 cycles of color burst at the right time, the color burst can be
left always ON. Yes, this includes h-sync period. In the active part of
each line, the phase of the color sub-carrier is changed to generate
different colors. The rest of the line including sync can have the color
burst superposed with the rest of the signal( sync, front porch , back
porch). TV's dont care since they remove the chroma signal anyway.
References
Hello Thejasvi and Sagar (I'm commenting on both of your blogs). I've been doing some very similar work recently, involving video and he LPC1768. Is there a common forum where I can share my ideas on this kind of project? I think I have some pretty innovative solutions. My application is a bit different from yours, but the technical details are very similar.
ReplyDeleteSincerely,
-Chris
sorry to post anonymously - I couldn't get the website to accept my ID for some reason. I am The Stumbling Engineer at http://technobar.blogspot.com
ReplyDelete-Chris
I'd love to see your ideas.
ReplyDeletePerhaps we could discuss it in the lucidscience forum. This is a link to my post there.
http://www.lucidscience.com/forum/tm.aspx?high=&m=536&mpage=1#537
If you like retro hardware, then you'll love Brad's Lazarus-64 project.
http://www.lucidscience.com/pro-lazarus-64%20prototype-1.aspx
Your video generating articles are awesome.
ReplyDeleteCan´t wait to read more :)
I am not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic.
ReplyDeleteI needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
Thanks for fantastic info I was looking for this information for my mission.
Feel free to visit my webpage : sub woofer